Biased Argument: Evolutionary Economics and Sociology of Technology
Any opinion with Indonesia that started with Indonesia is rich country is biased, politically driven argument. I simply dont trust that. Any opinion that started with Indonesia is mismanaged, is of course, biased and politically driven. Any neutral scientific argument should start that with the number, not an adjective.
Let say, Oil production, from the historical pattern we know that the oil production is declined. But what is the interpretation of this decline?
My common mistakes, giving adjective which are:
- Seeing the past, there is tendency to conclude which one is good and which one is bad. There should be no good and bad.
- Seeing the future, there is tendency to conclude which one is going to work and which one is not
Scientist, could not give you the answer. They only give you the description, and explanation why this happened. For example in energy transition, the explanation is that there is introduction of steamship and steamtrain that trigger the coal transition.