Anjar Priandoyo

Catatan Setiap Hari

Modelling vs Theoretical Approach: Energy Development

leave a comment »

Indonesia has unsustainable energy development

  • It caused by lag in energy ladder (theoritical) > see other paper
  • It caused by slow in energy transition (theoretical) > see other paper
  • It caused by low utilization in renewable energy (modelling) > see other research
  • It caused by lack of understanding in environmental impact (modelling) > see other research

THEORETICAL APPROACH
Supply/Demand:
Energy infrastructure development is slow (argument), indicated by energy supply is inadequate, refinery is limited, SOE too dominant (facts supporting argument). A study (Basri Hill 2004) indicated that energy policy is significant factor contributing the development.

MODELLING APPROACH
Supply/Demand:
Diversification of energy sources has been important factors for Indonesia government (argument), indicated by national energy policy which increase RE by 23% and reduce GHG by 26%. A study (Rachmatullah et al 2007) indicated that it can reduce GHG by 15% by using integrated coal gasification and advanced gas combined cycle.

Others Note.
Energy development is slow (argument). From period of 1980 to 2010 average growth of Geothermal is only 6-7% (facts supporting argument).

Looks good :)

Iklan

Written by Anjar Priandoyo

Februari 27, 2017 pada 6:30 pm

Ditulis dalam Science

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

%d blogger menyukai ini: